អ៊ុមដាតុល រីអាយ៉ះ (ការពន្យល់ក្បួនច្បាប់វីកាយ៉ះ ហាណាហ្វី)

(Bought a slave girl forbidden by permission, to him (1) to dissect her with a haircut, or with a pen (3) toothpick, then to have intercourse, and he is the first one to analyse by coitus (4): Saying (5): with permission related to saying: forbidd; i.e. harmed by permission of the owner even if harmed without his permission not considered (6); [God knows the right] (7).

The Book of Cockfighting [1]

It is a contract[((1)] subject to the king[(2)] pleasure[(3)): any solution[(4)] enjoyment[(5)] man[(6)[(7)] of the woman[(8) [(1)].

The contract is to bind the parts of the act: the positive and the acceptance, but here I want the contract to be the source of the contract, which is the connection, but the contract is the positive, but we said that because the contract was the cornerstone, not external things such as the ribbons.

I have mentioned in the explanation of the revision in the final chapter: As the sale, the law rules that the positive and acceptance that exists are bound by a judicial connection, and a legal meaning is obtained that is the property of the buyer. That meaning is the sale. In that sense, the compound sum of the negative and the acceptance with that legal connection; not that the sale is merely that legal meaning, and the positive is a machine for it, as some speculate.

There is no doubt that he has four defects: the actual defects are: (5) the contracting parties. The material ones are: (6) the positive and the acceptable. The pictorial ones are the aforementioned links, which are considered to be the law of his existence.

And the end of the matter is that the interests of the marriage are subject to the contract, because the sale and gift and its terms prove the king of pleasure, but are not subject to it, so the sale is in a place where the enjoyment does not apply.

(It is held in the affirmative[1]) and accepted[2]) The wording of the two is: Past[(((5)): as a wife, and married, or past[(6)] and future: as my husband, so he said: wife, even if they do not know[(7) ] The meaning of the words is: (1) the lawful one mentioned, and the intended one in the future: the matter[(2)], and the saying: (3) ((4): my husband ((5) delete[6)] its effect towards: my wife, your daughter, or yourself.

And I know that my husband is not really positive, but he is a trustee, and then he says: wife positive and accept, one takes over both sides of the contract, other than the sale, then if he says, "I mean this thing", he says "I sold", the sale is not complicated unless the other says, I bought, then one does not take over the two sides; because the contract rights go back to the contractor at the sale door, but in the contract his rights go to the husband and wife, if he is not the contractors, he is an ambassador.

(They say: [1]): Dad, (2) Wetherft, (3) Without a Meme, (4) After Daddy, (5) Wether a Boy, (6): If you say: [7] To the woman Khwisten Rapzni with a Fan, [8] Daddy, she said: Dad, then told to the other yetherftie, he said: Yetherft with the removal of the Meme, screw the fuck up, (like buy and sell): It means [if] (9) Said to the seller: Sell me, he says:

Sold, then told to the buyer: buy, he said: buy is right to sell, (not saying both [1]) at the witnesses Mazen and Swayem [2].

It is recommended that you marry, and give, and own, and sell, and buy, not rent, and loan, and a will. It is also recommended to marry and marry and what is the status of owning the eye immediately.

This is the officer. It is not proper to say rent and lease, because they are not placed to possess the eye, nor to say will and testament, because it is placed to own the eye not at once.

The word[(1)] which is put to possess the eye if it is released[(2)] and is a sign that the subject is not meant to be, that the wife is free, and the metaphorical meaning, which is king of pleasure, is the king of the eye[(8) ] cause of the king ((1) pleasure, and is the release of the word cause on the cause.

And when the Shafi'i does not agree with these words, and agrees with them[4] with the word: alms; proper to the Prophet upon him is prayer and peace; to his saying: {Hallelujah unto thee}.[5][6] And we have: the saying, {If she gave herself unto the Prophet}, the verse is a metaphor,[7] and the metaphors do not apply to the presence of the message, and his saying is: {Ahlulloh to thee} in not having to pay the dowry,[8] or we have resolved them to be proper to thee: i.e. they are not permissible for anyone to marry.

(and conditions) (3) to hear each other's words, and attendance (or free and two free), as opposed to the shafi'i. (and condition) (3) - may Allah be pleased with him - since he has only the testimony of men, (two Muslims who listen together) (4) not to be heard separately, as if they had been in one's presence, then he was absent, and another attended, then returned (5) in his presence.

(It is valid in the case of two immoral people[(1)], or limited in slander[(2)], and in the case of two blind people, and the two sons of the spouses(3), and (1) the sons of one of them [not of the other](2), but it does not appear[(3)] in them if the relative claims [(4)])(5). The wife, if (8) she claims, their testimony is not accepted for her, and if the husband claims, (9) [his] (10) is accepted.

(Just as it is valid[(1)] for a non-Muslim to marry a non-Muslim[(2)] with two non-Muslims[(3)], and it is not apparent from them[(4)] that (5) is ungrateful[(6)]): [i.e. the Muslim](7), then the testimony of the infidel against the Muslim(8) is not accepted, and if (9) the Muslim claims(10) it is accepted(1) for him.

(Another command (2) [(3)] is for him to marry his little girl (4), so he has sex (5) [(6)] with an individual. If her father is present, it is valid, otherwise it is not); If the father is present, [(7)] the term agent is transferred to the father, so it becomes as if the father has entered into the contract, and the agent and that individual are two witnesses[(1)], ([like a father who marries his adult (2) with an individual if she is present, it is valid[(3)] otherwise it is not), so it becomes as if the adult woman is contracting [(4)], and the father and that individual are witnesses](5), and the phrase ((the summary)) is this: And the agent is a witness if his client is present, just like the guardian if she is present. His guardianship [(6)] is extreme (7). [Chapter of taboos]

(And it is forbidden[(8)] to a person (1) his ascendant, his descendant, his sister, her daughter, his brother’s daughter, his paternal aunt, his maternal aunt, his wife’s daughter (2) [if] (3) she has intercourse[(4)], his wife’s mother, even if she does not have intercourse[(5)], and the wife of his ascendant and descendant[(6) ]). The word ((the abbreviated))[(1)]: and it is forbidden[(2)] its origin, its branch, the branch of its near origin, and the sulbiyyah(3) of its distant origin(4). So the close relative: the father and mother, and their descendants: brothers, sisters, nieces, and sisters, even if they are descending[(5)], so all of these are forbidden.