អ៊ុមដាតុល រីអាយ៉ះ (ការពន្យល់ក្បួនច្បាប់វីកាយ៉ះ ហាណាហ្វី)

And as she wishes [(4)] it is revocable [(1)], and if she does not wish, then if she wishes like the husband is irrevocable, or three, it is valid, and if she intends three, and the husband is one, irrevocable (2), or by the heart[(3)] then she is revocable, and if he does not intend anything, then whatever she wants), this is the saying of Abu Hanifa - may God be pleased with him -, and the bottom line [(4)] is that the method is delegated to her, not the basis of divorce, so it is revocable if she does not want. The woman, if she wants, then if his will agrees [(1)] with her will in the irrevocable matter, or three things, then what they agreed on will take place, and if it contradicts it (2) then it will be (3) revocable. Because her will must be considered; Because the husband has authorized her, and his will must also be taken into account. Because her will is learned from the husband; If they contradict each other, then the principle remains, i.e. one revocable one, and if the husband’s will does not exist, the woman’s will is considered regarding the manner, and as for them, just as the manner is delegated to her, the principle of divorce is also delegated to her[(4)].

(And as many times as she wants, or as long as she wants, she may divorce[(1)] as she wants(2) during her session and not after it, and if she wants[(3)] he reverts[(4)].

And if you divorce yourself for three things you want, you have the right to divorce yourself for anything less than that, not three times.) This is according to Abu Hanifa - may God be pleased with him -; Because from [(1)] is for differentiation, and according to them: she may divorce herself three times, so it is from for clarification. We said[(2)]: Everything is possible, and some are certain, so it is predicated on it.[(3)]

Chapter on swearing divorce [(1)] (The condition for its validity[(2)] is ownership, or addition to it(3), so do not divorce[(4)] a foreign woman. He said to her: If I spoke to you, then you are such-and-such, so he married her and spoke to her.

She will be divorced after the condition (1) if he tells his wife, “Speak to her” (2)); For the presence of the king at the time of suspension, (or he said to a foreign woman: If I marry you, then you are such and such, so let him marry her); Because there is an addition to the property, and according to Al-Shafi’i (3) - may God be pleased with him - it does not apply [(4)]. What is meant [(5)] is in addition to ownership: the suspension of divorce by ownership.

(And the terms of the condition[(1)]: If, if, and when, and every[(2)])(3), such as: Every woman of mine who enters the house is divorced, (and whenever, whenever, and whenever, then in it[(4)](1) The oath is dissolved if the condition is found once except in: whenever; it is dissolved after the three), what is meant by the dissolution of the oath: the invalidation of the oath due to the invalidation of the condition, (it does not take place[(2)] if he marries her after another husband(3), except If [(4)] is included in marriage, such as: Whenever I marry you, you are such and such, [he breaks his oath every time, even after another husband](5), then whenever he marries her, she is divorced, even if it is after another husband.

(The disappearance of ownership[(6)] does not invalidate the oath, and it is dissolved[(7)] after the condition absolutely, and a condition for divorce is ownership(1), so his saying: absolutely: that is, whether the condition exists in ownership, or other than ownership, and if it exists in ownership, it is dissolved into a penalty: that is, the oath is invalidated and the penalty results from it, and if it exists[(2)] not in ownership, it is dissolved not into a penalty: that is, the oath is invalidated, and does not entail the penalty[(3)]; Due to the lack of localization[(4)], if he said: If you enter the house, you are divorced three times, and he wanted[(5)] that she enter the house without the three taking place, then his trick[(6)] is to divorce her one time[(7)], and the waiting period is over[(1)], so she enters the house until the oath is invalidated, and the three are not valid, then he marries her. If she enters the house, nothing is done because the oath is invalidated.

(And if they differ[(2)] regarding the existence of the condition, then the statement is his[(3)] except with her proof[(4)](5), and in a condition[(1)] that is only known from her(2) She has spoken the truth[(3)] with regard to her in particular, as in: If she menstruates, then you divorce so-and-so, and if you love the punishment of God, then you are such-and-such, and his servant is free. If she says: She menstruates and he loves him[(4)] she is divorced only, and in if She has menstruated. The penalty shall be imposed after (5) seeing the blood for three days[(6)] from the beginning[(7) ]): That is, if he says: If she has menstruated, then you are such and such, then after she has seen the blood for three days, the penalty shall be ruled from the beginning of the bleeding. Because it is clear by seeing blood for three days that it is menstruation, so after the three days it is ruled that the penalty will be imposed at the beginning of it. (And in: If she menstruates[(1)] it does not occur until she becomes pure[(2)]); The menstruation is complete [(3)]. (And in: If you fast for a day, then you are divorced. You will be divorced when you set [(4)] from the day you fasted, unlike: If you fast, then it counts as fasting for an hour.

And if [(1)] divorced one divorce for the birth of a male and two divorces for the birth of a male and two divorces for the birth of a female and she gave birth to them, and the first did not know, one divorce was to be fulfilled and two divorces were divorced): i.e. religiously: meaning between him and God Almighty, (and the waiting period[(2)] ended with the birth of the pregnancy): that is, with the second birth, but it does not take place[(1)] with (2) another divorce; Because the waiting period ends with childbirth, God Almighty said: {And those who are pregnant[(3)] their term is that they give birth to their burden}(4), then childbirth is a condition[(5)] for divorce to occur, so it is deferred from giving birth, so the waiting period ends with childbirth, so no divorce takes place after it.

(And if the divorce [(1)] is linked to two things, it will be valid if the second is found in the property, otherwise it is not.) Then his saying: If the second is found in the property: includes[(1)] if they are found in the property, or only the second is found in the property, and his saying: Otherwise, neither of them includes if neither of them is found in the property, or the first is found in the property but not the second (2).

(The fulfillment[(1)](2) invalidates the condition. If he made the three conditions conditional, then fulfilled the three, then returned to him after the analysis(3), then the condition was fulfilled, nothing would happen.

And whoever attaches the three parts through intercourse with his wife, then he penetrates): that is, he inserts his glans until the two circumcisions meet[(4)], (and he stays there and is not barren (1) upon him[(2)])(3): Aqr: the equivalent dowry[(4)], and it was said: It is the amount of the reward for intercourse if adultery had been permissible, (and likewise if he attached the emancipation of his female slave through intercourse with her, and he did not return to it in the revocable period(5), so if he removed[(6)], then he penetrated, it must be Al-Aqr, and it was a return.

[Chapter on the exception] And if he said: You are divorced, God Almighty willing, with a continuous connection[(1)](2), or she died before he said: God Almighty willing, it would not take place[(3)], and if he died, it would take place[(4)]): That is, if he said: You are divorced, then he began to speak, God Almighty willing, and he died before completing it. (And if you are divorced three times, except for two, one falls [(1)], and if there are two more than one,(2).

The patient's divorce door (the patient who becomes divorced, and does not recover his donation only from the third): who was dominant, who thought him ill, and incapable of establishing his interests outside the house, and determined in him: i.e. to establish his interests in the house.

(If he divorces his wife, and he is likewise, and dies for this or that reason, he inherits, as opposed to the shafi'i, and know that the dispute is whether he divorced her three times; because if he divorcing her explicitly, she inherits an agreement, and so if he divorce her with pronouns, we have an agreement. Because the woman of the fugitive inherits and he has an agreement because the pronoun is a reverse, and if she is unmarried, she does not inherit an agreement; because she is satisfied with the separation, so the three remain, he is a place of dispute.

(And so ((4) a student ((5))) ((1) a regressive ((2) divorced threefold): i.e. she asked the patient for a retroactive divorce and divorced her threifold inheritance from us, (and a statement ((3))) she kissed her son-in-law, [who is in the county ((4)))))))); because the statement fell on his daughter not by the kiss of the husband's son, (who cursed her in his sickness): i .e. throwing her ((6)) in his illness ((7)) We were told, the band was cursed to inherit, this is attached ((8)) by suspending the divorce by an act not due to the woman since she does not have to be reprimanded; to pay the shame for herself, (or to Ali ((1))))) (2) of them also (((3)) also ()) that is, she pledged in her sickness that she would not approach four months, until the next day, and then the next morning, until her death.

(And whoever did it outside the house complaining (3) or ham, or whoever is confined (4) or in the line of battle, or imprisoned with a penalty, or stoned if divorced): that is, divorced, and he likewise does not inherit.

And so, mixed-up, she chose herself, and who divorced three at her command, or not at her order, then right, and then died not inherit.

(If the spouses agree on three (3) in case of (4) health, and gone the count (5)): i.e. agree in his illness on the occurrence of divorce (6) the three in case the health, gone the number, (then (7)) acknowledge her debt (1), or recommend something, she has less of it, and from the inheritance: i. e. if the headquarters, or the person recommended by him, is less than the heritage, he has that, and if the hereditance is less, she also has the heritance (4).

And know[(1)] that the letter (((2): from; in saying: it has less of him and of the inheritance; is not a relation to the deed of preference [if it were, the duty must be less than each of them, and not so, but a letter from to the statement, and the deed is preference](3) used the blame, it must be said: or from the heritage; because for what he said: least; between the least with one of the two, the link is the least deleted, which is from the other: i.e. it has ((4) one of them who is less than the other, become[(5) ]((1) the meaning: or, or be the ow on its meaning, but not wanted by the total, the least country which is the hereditary, and another is recommended, in the law of the aggregate, that is, that the minority is constant, but according to two times.