អ៊ុមដាតុល រីអាយ៉ះ (ការពន្យល់ក្បួនច្បាប់វីកាយ៉ះ ហាណាហ្វី)

Beginner, and to whom it is said: experience, then explain the council, saying: (unless you do[1], or do not[2]) do what it cuts off afterwards: [i.e. not have[3]] the choice after it is done by the councils[4], nor after a work that cuts it off[5]), the counsel, changes with one of two things, either by doing, or after a job that is not of a previous sex.

(And the sitting of the list, and the reclining of the base, and sitting the couch, and praying the father to the shouri, and witnesses witnessing them, and stopping the dabba, her ride is not cut off, and her walk, her ascent, her walk), until the council does not change with the walk, and it changes with the walking of the walk.

(And in my choice it is not true))) 1) the intention of the three))) (2) (3)), but it appears (4) if she says: I chose myself, or I choose (1) myself (2), and the condition of mentioning the self (3)) from one of them. (4) In my choice of choice, if she said: I choose to be shown (5)): i.e. if one of the two does not mention the self, but the husband says: Choose a choice, falls. (6) If she says, I chose.

(If you repeat[(1)] Choose three ((2), she said: I chose a choice, or I chose the first, or the middle, or last falls three without intention ((3)), and this is with my father Hanifa ((4) - may Allah be pleased with him -; because he met in her king the three shots without order, as the community in the place ((5) ((6)), then if ((7) the champion of the primary, the middle ((8)), and the last, remained absolute of choice, it became as if she had said: "I chose".

(If she said: I divorced myself, or I chose myself with the divorce of Pant[2] with one in the right, (3)), and mentioned in the guidance: It falls one, and owns (5) the return. It was said: This is wrong, it fell from the writer, and it is right that it has no return.

And if he says: "Your order is in your hands", and the three of them are in their hearts, she says, "I chose myself one time, or one time falling", and if she says "I divorced myself one, or I chose myself divorced, then one thing is clear".

And if he says: your order is in your hand today and after tomorrow, does not enter the night [1] in it, and hero [2] The order of the day if you return it, remains the order of tomorrow, and in your order today and tomorrow entered the night, and does not remain in the tomorrow if you returned it in its day [3]; because the night becomes a follower here, the sum becomes one delegation [4] [5]; if it returns in some the hero of the sum [6] as opposed to the first chapter [7]; because it becomes two delegations, if one of them returns the rest of the other.

[Chapter on the will] (And if he said[(1)]: Divorce yourself, and he did not intend, or he intended only one, and she divorced herself, then it is (2) revocable[(3)], and if she divorced three times and his intention(4)[(5)] is valid[(6)], and the intention for both of them is not[(7)], [unless the married woman was a female slave](8)); [Because it is one legal entity in her right[(9)]](1), because his saying “divorce” means do the act of divorce, so divorce is a noun, and it is an individual word[(2)] that can be considered one legal entity, which is three, so (3) does not indicate (4) the number.

(And it happens[(5)] that I think I am a reactionary person). Because she said in response to divorce yourself, it does not have the meaning of an irrevocable divorce, but rather an absolute divorce, so in her saying: I divorced myself; The quality of divorce is invalidated, and the divorce remains absolute[(6)], which is revocable, (and I chose myself that it does not take place); Because it is not one of the words of divorce [(1)].

(It is not permissible to retract [(1)] a divorce from yourself, and he is bound by the council, and in the case of divorcing your co-wife [(2)], and divorcing two wives other than them: that is, it is permissible for him (3) to take back a divorce, and he is not bound by the council; Because [(4)] divorcing yourself is not a power of attorney, rather it is an oath[(5)], because divorce is suspended by divorcing her, and the oath is a necessary act, so it is not accepted to be taken back, then it is ownership; Because she [(1)] works for herself, so (2) is bound by the council, and as for me divorcing your co-wife, and divorcing my wife, she is a power of attorney, so he accepts her return, and he is not bound by [(3)] the council.

(And in divorcing yourself whenever you wish, he is not bound[(1)]): That is, by the council, (and in divorcing her if you wish, he is bound by[(2)] and not taking it back): That is, if (3) said to someone(4): Divorce my wife if you wish, he is bound[(5)] by the council; Because he attached it [(6)] to his will, so it became ownership, not power of attorney, so he adheres to the council, and does not withdraw from it, as in the case of divorcing yourself.

(And if he said to her (1): Divorce yourself three times, and she divorced one[(2)], then one (3), and nothing would happen to the opposite): That is, if (4) he said to her: Divorce yourself once, and she divorced three times, nothing would happen (5) according to Abu Hanifa - may God be pleased with him -; Because he delegated [(6)] to it the occurrence of one intentionally, not within the three, and in both of them (7) one falls [(8)]. (And if you command (1) to do the clear (2), or the revocable (3) and reverse (4), what (5) commanded [(6)] (7) will happen.

It does not count as if you divorce yourself three times if you wish, if you divorce yourself once, and vice versa): that is, [if] (1) he said to her: Divorce yourself once if you wish, and she divorces yourself three times, it does not count, for in the first case nothing counts; Because what is meant is if you will the three, and the will of the three does not exist [(2)], and in the second [(3)] nothing happens according to Abu Hanifa - may God be pleased with him -; Because what is meant is to divorce yourself as one intentionally if you wish, and the will of one person does not exist intentionally, and in both cases one will occur [(4)].

(Nor are you divorced [(1)] if you wish? She said: You wish, if you wish. He said: You wish). Because [(2)] divorce was suspended according to her existing will, but this did not happen; Because she conditioned the existence of her will on the existence of His will, and she had no knowledge[(3)][(4)] of the existence of His will; This is [(5) ] because his saying, “You are divorced” is an instantaneous divorce, so it is a syllable in the instant, but on the condition of her will, for her will must exist in the instant, and that does not exist[(1)], (even if[(2)] he intends divorce): that is, if he intends to divorce by saying: I want.

He said in ((Al-Hidaya))[(1)]: Because there is no mention of divorce in the woman’s words; So that the husband becomes willing to divorce her, and the intention does not work in anything other than what is mentioned, even if he says: I want to divorce you, it takes place if he intends[(2)], because it is an initiatory utterance[(3)]; Because will[(4) ] predicts existence(1)(2).

I say [(3)]: If the husband says: You are divorced if you wish, then what it means is if you wish, I will divorce you, and she said: I will, if you wish: that is, I will divorce me if you will, and the husband says: I will: that is, I will divorce you. Since divorce is preordained [(4)] the intention is to be acted upon in it, then it can be answered [(5)] by saying that the preordained divorce is the object of the will, and if the husband says: I will that the object will be preordained for it, which is divorce, then this is what it is. The divorce that was made an effect of the will, not the divorce that was made a penalty for the will, and appreciating that divorce does not necessitate its occurrence; Because he made divorce dependent on her will. Divorce is an existing will, and that will did not exist. Rather, the woman made her existence dependent on the existence of his will, and it is unknown to her. But if he said (1): I wanted a divorce, and he intended it to happen; Because this is the creation of a beginner, but [(2)] it requires intention; Because it is possible [(3)] that what is meant by divorce is the effect of the will, so if he intends this it does not take place, and if he intends a preliminary divorce it does take place, then the intention is necessary.

(And also [(1)] every comment is non-existent (2). It happens if she is attached to an existing thing), as if she said: I wish, if the sky were above the earth.

(And you are divorced if you want, or if you want, or whenever you want, or whenever you want, and the matter will not be reversed if you return her [(1)]); Because she has the right to divorce at the time she wants, so (2) there was no ownership prior to her will so that it would be returned by restitution (3), (and she may divorce one person whenever she wants [(1)] and nothing else (2).

And whenever you want, it has one rhythm, then and then (1); Because the word: whenever; Actions apply as well as times, (not all three[(2)](3), and not divorce[(4)] after another husband); His statement: Nor is the talaq in the nominative case a conjunction of the rhythm added to the three (5), and his estimation: It does not have the rhythm of all three, nor does the tatleeq.

(And wherever you want, wherever (1) you want, he adheres to the Council[(2)](3).